Galaxy Clusters as Laboratories for the Dark Sector
probing the nature of dark matter and alternative theories
Overview
The mass budget of clusters is dominated by dark matter, which outweighs the baryonic (gas and stellar) mass by a factor of roughly five to one. This makes clusters powerful laboratories for studying the “dark sector”: not only the detailed physical properties of dark matter itself, but even the question of whether the phenomena attributed to dark matter require a new particle species at all, as opposed to a modification of gravity. My work in this area has approached the problem from three different angles: using the dynamics of colliding clusters to probe the collisionless nature of dark matter, using the internal structure of merging clusters to constrain dark matter self-interactions, and using the detailed mass profiles of relaxed clusters to test an alternative, purely gravitational explanation for “dark matter” phenomenology.
Dark Matter Dynamics in Cluster Mergers: The Puzzle of Cl 0024+17
Because dark matter is thought to be very nearly collisionless, while the hot intracluster gas is a weakly collisional fluid, high-speed collisions between clusters can separate the two components spatially, producing offsets between the total mass distribution (traced by gravitational lensing) and the gas distribution (traced by X-rays). The most famous example is the “Bullet Cluster,” but an even stranger case is the galaxy cluster Cl 0024+17, for which a weak- and strong-lensing mass reconstruction performed by Jee et al. (2007) revealed an unusual ringlike substructure in the dark matter distribution. In that same work, they proposed that this ring was produced by a high-speed, nearly head-on collision between two clusters 1-2 Gyr in the past, with the ring forming from the radially expanding, “splashback” of dark matter particles following pericentric passage.
In (ZuHone et al., 2009), my collaborators and I tested this scenario directly with N-body simulations of cluster collisions, exploring a range of impact parameters, mass ratios, and initial velocity distributions for the dark matter particles. We found that such collisions do produce a “shoulder” feature in the post-collision dark matter distribution, but not a true ring, even when the initial velocity distribution is highly tangentially anisotropic (see Figure 1). A ring-like feature could only be reproduced by assuming a purely circular (tangential) initial velocity distribution for the dark matter particles, which is not realistic for halos built up through hierarchical structure formation in a cosmological context. We were therefore unable to find a fully satisfactory explanation for the dark matter ring in Cl 0024+17 using standard collisionless dynamics, leaving open the possibility that the true explanation involves either more complex merger geometries, projection effects, or physics beyond the standard collisionless dark matter picture. However, a more likely explanation is that the ring structure may be an artifact of the lensing analysis of Jee et al. (2007), as later lensing studies of the same system did not find it (see, e.g. Umetsu et al. 2010)
Testing Self-Interacting Dark Matter with Sloshing Cold Fronts
A more direct way to probe non-standard dark matter physics is to ask whether dark matter can interact with itself beyond gravity via short-range interactions. Such self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) models are motivated in part by persistent small-scale puzzles in galaxy and cluster cores. Clusters that have undergone minor mergers frequently display “sloshing” cold fronts (see my page on cold fronts for more on this phenomenon), spiral-shaped discontinuities in the X-ray-emitting gas that form because the collisionless dark matter and collisional gas respond differently to the gravitational perturbation of an infalling subcluster.
In (ZuHone et al., 2019), my collaborators and I used combined N-body/hydrodynamic simulations to ask how this picture changes if the dark matter itself has a nonzero self-interaction cross section. In an isolated cluster, increasing the cross section flattens the dark matter density profile into a core, which produces a modest adiabatic expansion and cooling of the gas near the cluster center. In merging clusters, cold fronts still form via the same basic mechanism as in the collisionless case, but the flattened central potential allows the sloshing gas to expand to somewhat larger radii early in its evolution (see Figure 2). More strikingly, as the infalling subcluster’s dark matter halo passes through the core, self-interactions strip away its dark matter mass, weakening its gravitational influence on the core gas; the resulting sloshing motions are slower than in the collisionless case, which suppresses the growth of Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities and the associated turbulent mixing and entropy generation at the cold fronts. For cross sections per unit mass above roughly 1 cm2 g-1, the infalling subcluster’s dark matter halo does not survive as a self-bound structure beyond about two core passages. We also found that the offset between the peaks of the X-ray surface brightness and the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich signal during sloshing is sensitive to the dark matter cross section, potentially providing an independent, non-merger-based observational handle on dark matter self-interactions.
Testing Emergent Gravity as an Alternative to Dark Matter
Rather than probing the properties of a dark matter particle, one can instead ask whether the phenomena attributed to dark matter require new matter at all, or whether they can be explained by a modification of gravity itself. Erik Verlinde’s “Emergent Gravity” proposes that the apparent excess gravity attributed to dark matter emerges from the thermodynamics of the entanglement entropy of the de Sitter background, without invoking a new particle species, and makes a specific, parameter-free prediction for the “apparent” dark matter distribution given the observed baryon distribution (and vice versa). This prediction can be tested most cleanly in relaxed, massive clusters, where accurate mass profiles can be reconstructed from a combination of optical, X-ray, and weak-lensing data.
In (ZuHone & Sims, 2019), we carried out this test using a sample of massive, dynamically relaxed clusters, combining weak-lensing total mass profiles, Chandra X-ray mass profiles of the hot intracluster gas, and, as an improvement over earlier work in this area, the stellar mass contribution of the brightest cluster galaxy in each system. We found that including the brightest cluster galaxy improves the agreement between the EG predictions and the observations in the innermost regions of the clusters (r ≲ 10-30 kpc), where the stellar mass of the central galaxy dominates. However, at intermediate radii (r ~ 100-200 kpc) the EG predictions for the mass profiles and baryon fractions are discrepant with the observations by a factor of up to roughly 2-6, with the agreement improving again near r500. We concluded that, at least in its current form, Emergent Gravity does not reproduce the observed mass distributions of relaxed galaxy clusters as well as the standard cold dark matter picture.